For those of you who are total novices to historical wargaming.... it is the simulation of battles using painted miniature figurines and model terrain. Dice and rulers are used to determine where units can move and the outcomes of fights. Actually, we use dice, rulers, and thick rule books with lots of rules. And we love it. For me, half the hobby is painting the miniatures, and half the hobby is fighting the battles.
As I have previously mentioned, wargaming has played an important part in my writing efforts. Although I am writing a fantasy novel, realistic action and believable battle scenes are still very important. I don't want to put anything into the novel that turns the reader off and breaks the willing suspension of disbelief.
About a month before Cold Wars, Matt Iverson contacted me looking for a partner. This was very fortunate for me as Matt is one of the best Field of Glory players in the United States. As Matt (who I will now refer to only as Mr. The King) was the more experienced player I deferred to him on most of the decision making. "We" decided that since the tournament was to be played on a 8' by 5' table (larger than the standars 6x4) we would take a very fast, maneuverable army. Our choice: Western Turks. It is an army almost entirely comprising of mounted archers.
Our Army:
One Inspired Commander.
Three Troop Commanders.
Two units of Nobles (Undrilled superior armored cavalry with lance and sword).
Four units of Arsiyah (Drilled superior armored cavalry with bow and sword).
Eight units of horse archers (Undrilled average unprotected light cavalry with bow and sword).
Two units of poor quality light foot archers.
Two units of poor quality light foot javilenmen.
Mr. The King thought the biggest threats to our army would come from lancer cavalry armies as well as longbow based armies. So he suggested we do some test battles on the Thursday before the tournament. The test battle against a Bosporan (lancer cavalry) army was very close and resulted in us making some army adjustments. In particular we dropped our plan to take a list that included Tibetan allies. Our second test match was against a 100 Years War English army. I ran the English and was totally humiliated by Mr. The King. The fight gave us confidence that we could deal with longbows. This was fortunate as at the tournament our first opponent was...
a Free Company army from the 100 Years War time period! Our opponents fielded something like:
Three units of heavily armored knights.
Four units of longbow.
Two units of dismounted men-at-arms.
Two large units of crossbow.
One unit of light foot.
We won the initiative and chose (of course) to fight on the steppes. A basic map of the battle:
(CLICK ON THE IMAGES TO GET THE FULL PICTURE)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a3c4/8a3c4baa230ca247479b8a55e5b786067a7c7270" alt=""
From our test match we knew we could win if we could concentrate bowfire against isolated longbow units. This became the core of our strategy. I took a majority of our bow-armed light horse and cavalry and drove hard for the Free Company's left flank. We wanted the flank threat to force them to break their line.
Mr. The King would take some mounted units and all of our foot and threaten the other flank. Our lancers would feint in the center, hoping to pull some longbow forward, before re-deploying to one flank.
Our deployment:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e6e7/7e6e7a5680d7a5f70fc655f21c69ab7fb921481d" alt=""
Their deployment:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d62ab/d62abd244cddb566d8a8b457db4133319f4c9edc" alt=""
Our Camp:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7371/b73715e7e5fd2e7c7fc76f453fe13a7bea62e50b" alt=""
After a few turns:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b1c3/6b1c3841790e8185235c4d2b747b37a1e009c623" alt=""
Near disaster:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd34d/cd34d78db88841286baacf4d14843b6ad605284f" alt=""
The Shootout:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa6fa/fa6fac2a5f3ebbe3c7880a572eb960f7624e16a8" alt=""
Another scare:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3fef/a3fef5d95b45d306c9d10ed579e549e138211749" alt=""
The battle is a major victory for the Turks. We lost one unit of armored cavalry bowmen in the center of the battlefield. Deciding to be cautious, we put the unit in one rank to skirmish with a six stand longbow unit. We figured our four dice of superior bowfire could take their four dice of average bowfire. We were wrong.
Shooty cavalry armies can definitely take on longbow armies in FoG. However, it is really important to break up the enemy line. Given the 8' by 5' table, the best our opponents could have done would have been to corner sit and hope for a draw. Coming out to fight us in the open was very dangerous.
Coming soon... Cold Wars Round Two.
And... if you are interested in historical fiction (Hellenistic) read my interview with Christian Cameron, author of the Tyrant series.
I tried to convince Matt to go with the Khazars rather than the Tibetan allies option when we play tested in MA before he headed down. I'm glad to see he did finally go that route.
ReplyDeleteChris
We ran a test and it was just too hard to get the Tibetans into the right place. The Khazar list we used had a ton of bowfire and was very easy to maneuver.
ReplyDelete